User:Leon Henningson

vc

Misadventures in VC Funding: The $24 Million Moz Virtually Elevated

by randfish on August 29, 2011

Above the study course of this 12 months, I’ve written a couple moments about elevating a likely round of venture financing for my business, SEOmoz. Eventually, the saga’s over, I’ve been launched from terms of confidentiality and I can share the lengthy, peculiar story of how I first rejected, was sooner or later persuaded, but finally did not elevate a 2nd round of expense money.

photo credit

My hope is the fact that by sharing, others can understand from our expertise and maybe keep away from some of the mistakes, pitfalls and discomfort we confronted.

Raising cash for a startup is surely an inherently risky proposition. You phase up to the plate knowing that the odds are slim and that, for every story of accomplishment on TechCrunch, there is 2 hundred companies pounding the road, obtaining nowhere. We went the opposite route - letting traders arrive to us (a method I wrote about last calendar year). That is the story of that have - being “pitched” by traders, the decision-making and negotiation processes as well as the conclude outcomes.

Do We really Need to Raise a Round?

In November of final year, 14 months following my earlier failed attempt to boost funds, we started out getting inquiries from many different corporations - venture capitalists and private/growth equity traders, inquiring if SEOmoz was thinking about pursuing funding. My solution was constantly the identical, and appeared pretty equivalent to your electronic mail beneath:

Above the subsequent months (Nov 2010 - April 2011) we hunkered down, concentrated on solution, engineering and advertising and grew the enterprise, mostly ignoring the likelihood of outdoor funding.

In March of 2011, one distinct investor (whom I’ll refer to through the relaxation of this post as “Neil”) reached out to us and was specially excited regarding the SEO/inbound marketing and advertising sector and SEOmoz specifically. He sent this e mail following our call:

It had been flattering and exciting to really feel this fantastic stage of curiosity within our company from an investor, and Neil wasn’t the sole 1, possibly. Here’s a list in the individuals we talked to noticeably (which means in excess of just a simple cellphone call or electronic mail) above the initial 7 months of 2011:

• Bessemer Enterprise Companions • GRP Companions • Stripes Group • Insight Ventures • JMI Equity • Level Equity • Mayfield Funds • Accel Companions • Summit Companions • NEA • Common Catalyst • K1 • Business Ventures

For your businesses famous previously mentioned, I’ll keep specifics of who we spoke to and just how far we progressed private (as I did in my submit within the 2009 knowledge) utilizing pseudonyms.

The week of Could eighth, I fulfilled with 3 investors in Ny city and 1 in Boston. In planning for these conferences, I attempted to remind myself that cash may possibly not be the very best point for the company using a manifeste web site submit about the theme. I used to be concentrated within the targets of building relationships, sharing our trajectory and studying up to feasible about how other people viewed our enterprise and market.

In spite of this bevvy of interest, my previous fundraising expertise had left me gun-shy and reticent about committing. Every week soon after the meetings in NYC, the Moz team had a critical chat about no matter whether raising a spherical might have a severe, good impact on the organization. That discussion involved a good deal of back-and-forth, however the reasons we in the end decided to check the waters far more seriously integrated:

• Increase Engineering - For the first quarter of 2010, we had a mandate to develop the engineering crew so we could increase our products more quickly. This proved extremely tough, as the much-reported tech talent wars in Seattle developed a vacuum of big-data savvy SDEs. Nevertheless, in Q2, our situation shifted as we had been capable to substantially develop the engineering staff - to a point wherever we needed to slow selecting in order to help keep payroll in line with our bootstrapped growth. Even though definitely a positive, this modification meant that we ended up restricted by cash inside the bank for the 1st time in a while.

• Scale Information - Linkscape, Blogscape and our APIs price ~$100K/month with the beginning from the year. In Q2, this expense had risen 30% and we foresaw a nearby time when it would double or even more. In July of this 12 months, people charges had been, without a doubt, almost $200K. We’ve gone from 40 virtual devices hosted on Amazon to 200, and even though we’re thrilled to see our metrics (mozRank, Domain Authority, et al) achieve prevalent adoption, lots of the large consumers use our totally free API, leaving our revenue from other channels to support these costs. Long-term, we imagine in free of charge, open information as a way to grow the brand name, the corporate and our revenue-producing channels (and it’s portion of our core values for being as open up and generous as is possible with our data), but the income restrictions had eventually turn into some extent of aggravation, and an additional explanation to seek development funds.

• Broaden Facilities/Benefits/Team Joy - The Moz offices can comfortably hold 45-50 individuals, but we realized that by Q3, we’d previously be at that range. We also recognized that the aforementioned talent wars were pushing us to increase the variety of advantages and room we provide to your team. Moz was named #6 on Seattle’s Finest Spots to Perform, but we’re striving for #1, and we strongly believe that the higher we are able to handle our crew, the more remarkable our output and final results will be.

• Release New Items - Our massive data tasks have been demanding, but additionally unbelievably fulfilling, and we felt a robust drive to complete far more, more quickly. We would like to supply marketing analytics outside of pure Search engine marketing, relocating to field like social, content marketing, regional and verticals (cell, video clip, blogs, and so on. - anything that sends visitors within the web organically). A number of those demand heavy upfront investments in information resources, engineering and market place investigation. One particular in the weird things I’ve located (which probably warrants a submit of its personal at some point) is usually that the more substantial your scale, the lengthier it will require to construct solution. You’d imagine that getting 15 full-time engineers along with a significant assistance group close to them would imply more rapidly development, nevertheless it does not - the dimensions we have to help (nearly 14K paying clients and 250K users of our free of charge merchandise) for nearly anything we launch indicates far better focus to architecture, reliability and top quality then after we had two devs and 500 consumers.

• Invest in Marketing and advertising - Right now, the majority of SEOmoz’s acquisition of new customers is by means of inbound/organic channels (~80%). We acknowledge there is a great deal of space for growth in equally organic (subject material marketing, much more local community expense, Search engine marketing, social, and so on) and in paid out advertising and marketing. An expense here would let us to take a lengthier see on customer payback interval (the time till we recoup an investment in acquisition) and experiment in new channels, also.

• Provide Liquidity to Founders - Gillian started the organization that would turn into SEOmoz in 1981 and I’ve been functioning along with her given that 2001. As Gillian’s stepped other than day-to-day obligations (post 2008) and taken on much more of an exterior evangelism position, many of us felt that providing her a more formal exit and liquidation path would be a great alternative. I also personally felt it had been wise to take some dollars off the table.

I’d be remiss if I did not also point out yet another meeting in Boston - with Hubspot’s Dharmesh Shah. For that previous couple of several years, Dharmesh continues to be a tremendous mentor to me, and somebody whom I often flip to when huge decisions like this show up. Within the theme of funding, he gave clear, well-reasoned guidance (and later on, built that suggestions manifeste). We achieved in Might, just following my in-person meetings in New york, and famous which the mixture of an excellent industry for expense plus robust development on the business built for superb fundraising circumstances.

Testing the Waters to get a Huge Financing Round…

As a result, in mid-May, when Neil asked to adhere to up with an in-person check out to our offices in Seattle, I sent the subsequent e-mail reply:

After that meeting in Seattle, points acquired sizzling and heavy. Neil wanted to do a offer and we commenced speaking conditions. It was at this point that our govt staff and board of directors made a decision to get some measures to insure that we have been producing the right moves. These involved:

• Meeting with and, hopefully, receiving provides from 2-3 from the other businesses who had attained out to Moz to assist examination the waters on valuation and offer conditions, and to be sure we had a companion and investor we liked.

• Deep-diving on Neil and his company. We ended up speaking immediately to people at two of their portfolio firms, many men and women who labored with Neil in his previous roles and back-channeling to nearly fifty percent a dozen other people who’d worked with him in a single way or another via our network of contacts (each at Moz, and through Ignition Partners, our investors from 2007).

• Functioning difficult on long-term, strategic organizing for 2012 and beyond - what did we wish to complete, simply how much wouldn\\\'t it take, and wherever would the cash be put in?

• Making ready a semi-formal slide deck to pitch the partnership at Ignition, as we desired them to take part in the spherical at the same time. We also made a mild version of this deck to send close to to numerous individuals within the subject and help drum up any prospective curiosity with out currently being too forward or pushy.

• Investigating the fundraising market for self-service SaaS organizations like ours by talking to as numerous not too long ago funded entrepreneurs within the space as is possible. By means of this analysis, we hoped to acquire a good idea of what types of phrases and valuation we must always anticipate, and what was “market” (VC-speak for “normal”).

In mid-June, I made a trip to San Francisco, ostensibly to take part in SimplyHired’s Search engine optimization Meetup, but in addition for numerous Bay-Area meetings with VCs. 3 of those turned into far more severe discussions.

June was also after we began to experience a bit cocky. We ended up in energetic negotiations with Neil. We had several talks going with investors while in the Bay Region, and nearly each week, we had a ping from a fresh resource reaching out to determine if we ended up prepared to start a conversation. I spoke to dozens of people by mobile phone and e-mail and figured out a whole lot much more in regards to the industry - and those discussions gave me a great deal of good reasons to obtain energized. As in 2007, a great deal of startups were reporting a very scorching marketplace for elevating funds. Valuations of many SaaS companies I talked with ended up inside the 6-10X revenue assortment (and people who raised in Q1/Q2 got valued on their 2011 believed revenues)!

Narrowing Down the Field

During the method, we’d been extra cautious about the investors we engaged. We turned away one organization due to a undesirable encounter we had with them in 2009 (email beneath).

This example wasn’t on your own - we turned away another soon after speaking to several of their portfolio businesses along with a organization they’d look at but did not put money into and listening to about some questionable conduct.

Our greatest filter wasn’t deal terms or value, but cultural match. We’d been warned repeatedly against incorporating an investor who did not share our core values or who displayed any dishonest/manipulative techniques in our discussions. That dominated out several people, but additionally made us more excited about Neil, “Reggie” (an investor in California) and “Todd” (at an additional California-based organization).

One of my favorite emails in our process arrived from Reggie, who sent this just ahead of their in-person go to to your Mozplex:

Lovely, proper?! Occasionally, it is the minor products. Neil constantly asked about my grandmother in New Jersey (she had a tough fall, a concussion and spent several weeks in hospitals, but is currently virtually 100% and performing effectively). Todd wolfed down many helpings of phenomenal braised pork shoulder made by our techniques engineer, David. Sarah and I dragged each Neil and Reggie to meals with equally of our substantial others.

But, the fundraising method certainly wasn’t all enjoyable, and it did need a tremendous amount of work, specifically from Sarah, Moz’s COO, and from Jamie  Joanna on our marketing staff, who held numerous calls with investors on the ton of membership acquisition/retention-related matters. Here’s a brief snippet of a weekend email thread that Sarah sent to Todd:

In June and July, the funding method almost certainly entailed numerous blended hours of work within the a part of our staff - a lot of that was me, but lots pass on to other departments and capabilities. We realized this was an incredibly large determination - a single that might massively effect the future of the firm - and thus, we wanted to be as diligent, thoughtful and cautious as you can.

By early July, we had been all the way down to 4 potentially serious investors. A single made the decision towards producing an offer across the center in the month. The others were Neil (from NY), Reggie (from CA) and Todd (also CA).

Closing the Offer

With the beginning of July, one particular from the traders made a proposal at a $50mm pre-money valuation for any $25mm investment. Here’s my e-mail reply:

That offer was subsequently raised to $65mm pre-money, which was matched by another agency (each Neil  Reggie). I used to be feeling rather good about my negotiation expertise, until finally a few weeks later on.

Todd was an early preferred of a number of Mozzers. On the finish of his pay a visit to to our offices, I gave him a journey back again towards the airport (I borrowed Geraldine‘s only-slightly-dented 2003 Kia Spectra, considering that I really don\\\'t really possess a vehicle). Near the stop with the conversation, Todd famous that his firm “would possess a hard time attending to $100mm” on our deal. I most likely should have corrected him at that stage (it will happen to be the TAGFEE thing to perform), but I instead mentioned some thing like “this isn’t entirely about the greatest pre-money valuation; it’s in regards to the right match for us.” This may serve as a excellent illustration of why I should not try to “play the game.” Every week afterwards, right after lots of back-and-forth, Todd noted that his firm just couldn’t match our valuation expectations, and although interested, can be backing out.

I’m unsure if our strategy with Todd was a giant misstep or even a tiny one particular, nor whether they\\\'d have made an offer in the $60-$70mm range if they’d believed that was our goal. I also don’t know why he believed we have been offered people considerably larger figures, nor what we should always have completed from there. We could have gone again and pushed on what they thought we wanted, nevertheless it appeared time had passed (challenging to explain why/how precisely).

We built our choice, sent a polite notice to Reggie thanking him and one more to Neil saying we have been all set to maneuver.

Pitching Ignition Partners

In addition to elevating cash from an exterior associate, we also wanted Ignition, who had place $1mm into your firm in 2007 to take part during this up coming spherical. Their assist can be helpful in making outside investors experience fantastic concerning the offer, and would support us have far more shared possession among our board members.

Beneath is the pitch deck I employed for Ignition (areas of this produced it in to the “light” version we sent to various other folks before inside the approach): SEOmoz Pitch Deck July 2011

See a lot more shows from Rand Fishkin

We’ve had a fantastic romantic relationship with Ignition more than the several years, and I continue to suggest them to startups of all types. As portion of the “thank-you” for their assist, Geraldine baked some cookie bars the evening just before our pitch meeting, which I brought to their offices and handed out before the presentation. I took a photograph hoping that I’d be capable of reveal it about the web site once the offer was completed:

Notice the delicious-looking baked products on the table

Ignition verified, just right after this meeting, that they’d adore to take part within our next spherical, in whatever amount built feeling for the exterior, lead investor. We had been fired up, and spent some critical time in July preparing a thorough method all around how to expand together with the funding. We even started out some discussions with other companies we had been contemplating getting.

Neil introduced many folks from his agency to our yearly Mozcon in Seattle. Around the final afternoon, we achieved to barter some closing conditions of the deal. It ended up seeking like this:

• $24mm invested; $19mm from Neil and $5mm from Ignition • $65mm pre-money valuation, $89mm publish • $18mm to SEOmoz’s stability sheet; $4.75mm to Gillian, $1.25mm to Rand • No liquidation choice for Sequence B (Ignition has a 1X about the Series A) • Straight favorite (meaning that the investor both gets their cash out in a sale Or perhaps the p.c of the business they very own, but not the two) • New board would include myself and Sarah (our COO), Michelle (from Ignition, who’s been on our board since 2007)